Hey all Just stuck the ZXR on the dyno, and I'm pretty happy with the results. Specs: ZXR250C - 1992 Top end rebuild (valves, seats, piston rings, honed cylinder). 17 inch rear wheel 15:47 gear ratio (this will affect the torque measurement I believe, note that 15:48 is close to stock ratios for a 17 inch rear wheel vs 18 inch). Results: Red line = Stock exhaust Blue line = JRE Moto muffler Stock muffler: 36.64 rwhp at 15200rpm (approx. 42.1 hp) 13.42 ft.lb at 13800rpm (approx. 18.2 N.m) JRE muffler: 37.55 rwhp at 15740 rpm (approx. 43.2 hp) 13.60 ft.lb at 13060 rpm (approx 18.4 N.m) Mainly I wanted to see how successful the rebuild had been, but also I like the sound of the JRE muffler and wanted to make sure it wasn't running too lean or rich, seems like it's better though so that's a win! I believe from factory they quoted 45hp at the crank. Only thing I'm sad about is that I didn't get a video haha
Hey dudes The AFR above is with the stock jetting: 122, 125, 125, 122 Do you think it would be safe to drop the jets to: 120, 122, 122, 120 To try and bring the AFR a bit leaner in the mid-high RPM range? It's quite consistently rich above 10krpm
It depends on what you're after. As @Murdo said, your suggested main jet change is almost insignificant. If you go to 110;112;112;110 then you'll see a few more ponies. If you're keen to chase HP, then get a bung welded into your exhaust so the Dyno person can monitor AFR accurately. Secondly, some of what is happening at higher revs is because of how the TCI has been 'programmed'. They tend to be designed so you can ride around without flat spots or hesitation and/or burning valves while going WOT everywhere. You could order an aftermarket TCI from Ignitech (Czech Republic) and that will let you play with the ignition advance across the rev range, but most importantly at higher revs. Again, it all depends on what you're after. The other 'thing' to consider is that on a Dyno there is little to no air flow into the air box and at higher revs the engine will be running out of oxygen, especially if the Dyno guy is doing several 'pulls'. I run a bastardized air box that retains the inlet trumpets (built into the airbox) and also the top of the airbox for any shockwave scavenging (not that I believe in that on 4-strokes).
Nice curves in the dyno charts - that torque curve is very nice. The hp loss up top does not appear to be too bad, despite the rich afr's you are getting above 12k. You might squeeze another couple of hp out by going a bit leaner on the mains, but remember at WOT you really want the afr's to be between 12 and 13 for engine longevity the richness could also be as a result of the stock airbox, they are quite restrictive. Were you using an oem air filter or an aftermarket filter for these runs? I am a big fan of tuning on a dyno, your dyno operator should have been able to give you some good advice on which way to go with jetting after these runs.
It's about what mine made at the wheel, roughly 37.5HP Mine was also rich up top, starting with the flat spot at 7,000rpm I did a bunch of mods including open exhaust, lixianda TCI, cut the diaphragm springs and drilled an extra 2.5mm hole in the slides. Nothing helped. It needs larger air jets but they are pressed in/permanent fit. Needles are also non adjustable as standard, you can shim them but this will just make it richer. However I have a set of adjustable needles from @sharky that I never fitted. If you want them, let me know.
Cheers guys for the responses! Honestly I'm not too familiar with much difference smaller/larger jets makes, but seems the general consensus is that one size will make little difference haha! I do have a a spare set of headers, so welding in a port for an AFR sensor is possible... I'm probably not keen to invest too much more money into programmable ignition etc, I was looking for a quick n' easy win on the AFR haha, noted that the jetting change I've suggested is going to be negligible, I'll look into ordering some smaller jets again and keep and eye on the plug colours? With regards to the airbox, mine was missing the little intake tube between the airbox and the fairing (not sure if that would make a difference on the dyno though?) Air filter is a Unifilter foam, not the stock one And yeah I probably should have questioned the dyno guy about what he would suggest, I could ask him although it was really just a run for numbers rather than tuning Yeah bud I used 15% for my calcs To be honest if you couldn't get much more out of yours then I don't think there's much hope in me pursuing it either haha Honestly I am very happy with the results, just thought it would be good to lean it off a little, but yeah not looking to invest too much money for the minimal gains at this point, happy with how she runs
Dano, I'm guessing your bike runs either the 21119-1322 or 21119-1384 TCI units. I'd be surprised if it's running the 21119-1316 TCI, but I've been surprised before. Below are the ignition curves for those TCI units. You can show them to your Dyno guy so he has an idea of what's happening across the rev range. The TCI unit @Linkin referred to (Lixianda) is a relatively cheap aftermarket unit that (unfortunately) has the rev limiter removed and (fortunately) opens up the top end of the ignition curve; this doesn't make any more power (on the dyno), but you will notice the power deliver is smoother up high and the power curve doesn't drop away dramatically like on a normal dyno pull. The ZXR250C TCI units have a slightly better ignition curve to the ZXR250A TCI units.
It is running the 21119-1322 (J) TCI unit, but I do also have a 1384 (B) and 1316 (K) in my spares box; is the 1316 better than the 1322 or the same? (I believe 1316 is the Malaysian market?) 21119-1322 (J) - I believe this is the 45hp C model (in service) 21119-1384 (B) - I believe this is the 39hp C model 21119-1316 (K) - I believe this is the Malaysian C model? 45hp / 240kph Looking at your graph actually, the 1322 and 1316 should be the same, and the 1384 is limited? I think having no rev-limiter would be a terrible idea for me hahaha
Hey Dano, yes the 1384 is limited. The 1316 is from the malaysian model, but I don't think it is any different to the other non-limited TCI units for the C model. I too believe that not having a rev-limited TCI on a ZXR250 is a bad idea. The Honda CBR seems to cope with being over-revved, but the ZXR does not like it at all. I think @Murdo runs a Lixianda unit on his CBR and he might have zinged it past the redline at least once and it survived. A couple of period 6 guys reckon the CBR can go 22,000rpm without permanent damage!
[QUOTE=" I think @Murdo runs a Lixianda unit on his CBR and he might have zinged it past the redline at least once and it survived. [/QUOTE] I will admit to seeing 21,000 on the tacho once when trying to beat an R1 at the drags with no ill effects to the engine.
Haha yes as much as I'd love to hear 22krpm on the ZXR, I would say the risk-reward ratio is heavily out of favour If one was really keen, I'm sure it wouldn't be too difficult to add a separate rev-limiter...
Must be satisfying to get dyno runs with those figures on something that you rebuilt yourself - kudos! Also that 1.1 HP is nothing to be sneezed, it's 2.6%.
Cheers all for the support haha! Ok so I have noticed she gets a little bit boggy around the 10krpm / half-throttle coming out of corners, it's manageable, but I'm assuming it would be related to the needle & emulsion tube? Looking at the parts diagrams and another thread https://2fiftycc.com/index.php?threads/zxr250-a-model-keihin-cvk30-carb-jetting-and-settings.9943/ There's two different needles and emulsion tubes for the 1992 ZXR250C. It is 4 of one, or 4 of the other (not 2&2), so how do I know which I should be using? Are they likely the same, or more likely region specific? Different characteristics? Assuming the ones with the A go together? Also I notice they are technically out of production haha
The different needles will be for inner/outer cylinders and an emulsion tube to match Parts diagram should tell you what goes where, but not always. The service manual will tell you for sure. Replied to your PM
Ahh you know the other thread said exactly that, but for some reason I thought that was specific to the A model, my bad, brain fart!
I think your 10,000rpm weak spot is a consequence of having a motor that revs to 16-18,000. There'll be resonance happening up top to make horsepower, but at 10k it ain't helping. My Yamaha is sweet below 10,000 and goes well above 10,200. In anything other than 1st gear on a flat it will not accelerate through that gap. As everyone seems to agree, it's richer than it needs to be. However, my son's R6 runs at .72lambda or about 10.5:1 and the pipe is spotlessly clean plus it makes good power. I suspect that just like 2-strokes, which I know about, that the fuel is to help the motor survive a good thrashing. My desired lambda is 0.88 or about 12.9:1 at WOT without boost in my Yamaha and 0.78lambda or 11.5:1 with boost. 12:1 should be safe as houses and give you a few horsepower. Buying a lambda meter is a good investment. Put it on for tuning then take it off once done